Maricopa.gov HomepageContact Us (Popup Window)
Site Map | Search | Phone Directory | Departments | Services
Return to Internal Audit Homepage Maricopa County Internal Audit
 
   Internal Audit Home   |  News   |  Site Map

Skip Navigation LinksInternal Audit : Reports

Annual Reports Financial Fitness More Reports

Subscribe: Receive email notification when reports are updated

Follow us on

Our Most Recent Work

badge
Sheriff's Office Risk Assessment – January 2012
Full Report

The object of the Risk Assessment was to identify operational functions within the Sheriff's Office and to gain an understanding of the key risks to the Sheriff's Office strategic objectives. We assigned a risk ranking to 30 MCSO key functions; thirteen were rated high risk. A risk assessment is used by auditors to prepare an audit plan that focuses limited audit resources in the areas where they can have the most impact.


sheriff's
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office - Vehicle Usage Review – December 2011
Full Report

This review focused on MCSO's compliance with vehicle-related policies. MCSO needs to strengthen adherence to certain policy provisions relating to vehicle insurance and take home vehicles.


cash
Maricopa County Attorney's Office - Expenditure Review – July 2011
Full Report

We reviewed a sample of MCAO transactions to determine if expenditures were appropriate, adequately documented, and in compliance with County policies and applicable laws, rules, and regulation. We found instances where expenditure controls could be strengthened.


holding
Human Services Department – July 2011
Highlights Full Report

In FY 2010, Human Services Department received $53.5 million in federal and state grants, including $9.4 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) economic stimulus grants. Due to the high grant revenues, our review was focused largely on grant reimbursements and related contracts and agreements. We found grant reimbursements are timely; however, contract administration could be improved.


ARRAlogo
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) – July 2011
Full Report

The Federal Government has awarded Maricopa County $62.6 million in ARRA funds which have been allocated to 13 County agencies. As of May 31, 2011, these agencies have collectively received $47.7 million. Based upon our review of the County's ARRA activities, it appears Maricopa County has implemented adequate procedures to comply with Federal accountability and transparency requirements.


magnifyglass
Non-Departmental – July 2011
Highlights Full Report

The Non-Departmental Agency (ND) accounts for $1.2 billion (53%) of the County's FY 2011 budget. The County uses ND to track expenditures that benefit the whole County or multiple County agencies. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) oversees the ND budget and authorizes expenditures. We focused on determining whether OMB adequately monitors ND expenditures.


bridge
Department of Transportation – June 2011
Highlights Full Report

Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) is responsible for providing transportation infrastructure and related services to people within Maricopa County so they can live, work, conduct business, and travel in a safe and clean environment. MCDOT is currently responsible for 2,048 paved miles and 446 miles of dirt roads. We found that controls over construction project management and information technology need improvement.


flood
Flood Control District (FCD) – June 2011
Highlights Full Report

FCD is responsible for providing floodplain management within all unincorporated areas of Maricopa County, as well as incorporated areas, unless the jurisdiction assumes the responsibility. Internal controls over cash receipts, Emergency Action Plans, and the ALERT system need improvement. The ALERT system includes over 700 gauges throughout the County that provide real-time data about weather conditions.


contractsigning
Contracts & Agreements – June 2011
Highlights

Maricopa County spends millions of dollars each year on contracts. We performed these audits due to the high risk of improper disbursements if contracts are not properly monitored. For the contracts reviewed, procurement and contract pricing requirements were mostly followed; however, overbillings and control weaknesses were found.


employees
Arizona Legal Workers Act – June 2011
Highlights

State statute requires government entities to conduct random verifications to ensure that contractors/subcontractors are complying with the Arizona Legal Workers Act. We selected one vendor for review to determine compliance with the Act. No unauthorized employees were identified. Contract, vendor, and employee selections were random.


checklist
Performance Measure Certification – June 2011
Highlights Full Report

Citizen's desire for government to be more transparent and accountable has grown. Managing for Results represents Maricopa County's commitment to transparency and accountability. We reviewed 40 Managing for Results performance measures for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and 2010 from seven County agencies. We found that only 38% of the measures reviewed were certified. The primary reasons measures were not certified was the lack of supporting documentation and inadequate procedures for collecting, measuring, and reporting performance.


  Maricopa Home      Site Map      Legal Information      Privacy/Security Policies
Maricopa County Home Page
Maricopa County || 301 W. Jefferson St. || Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-506-3011